(un)common ground

a commonplace book

Reading for Fullness; Conference for Readiness; Writing for Exactitude

Reading maketh a full man; conference a ready man; and writing an exact man. And therefore, if a man write little, he had need have a great memory; if he confer little, he had need have a present wit: and if he read little, he had need have much cunning, to seem to know, that he doth not.

Sir Francis Bacon, “Of Studies” (1625)

An intriguing illustration of wisdom as a circular (cyclical?) model of communication (or better, a rock-paper-scissors model). Bacon frequently makes these sorts of direct causal arguments. While difficult to prove, they make for lovely sentences. And of course Bacon seems to exemplify his own advice.

I particularly appreciate the relationship established between reading, conference and writing. Indeed, coming to one’s own conclusions without dialogical engagement can be problematic; as Sandel puts it, philosophical reflection requires an interlocutor.

What does it mean to be a “full man” via reading? How is being “full” tied to memory, which Bacon implies is the deficit incurred by the lack of reading?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on July 29, 2015 by and tagged , , .
%d bloggers like this: